Now this may seem like a bizarre question but it's one that I've never the less found myself pondering. Since my days at high school it always seemed to be the general consensus (among peers and much of the media) that women's sexiness is directly proportional to the amount of skin shown, how much booty shaking is occurring and how wide their legs are stretched. I see it everywhere, in films, music videos, games and advertising and I often end up finding it obnoxious or fascinating in a macabre way rather than sexually appealing.
I find a woman far more attractive in a knee length summer or cocktail dress, with a reasonably modest neckline, than in a string bare Bikini or micro shorts and a crop top. Heck even when wearing a full length ballgown I often find them more appealing. Lingerie can be incredibly alluring to me but only if it at least looks as though it can actually function as clothes rather than breast ornaments.
It's clear to me that I often prefer implied sexuality to more explicit displays, which I tend to find plain obnoxious (although that may come from my comparatively prudish upbringing). I was just wondering whether I'm in the minority in this way of thinking or whether anyone else agrees?